You are right I'm speculating - I don't have benchmarks to show. I'll do some test suite when I have the time, but the difference (XPS vs. XSLT)was too obvious. May be it is just in my case particularly.
Is it possible to measure the creation of a page from the inside? I'm not pretty sure which are the very first and the very last AxKit request points. Pavel ----- Original Message ----- From: Matt Sergeant To: Pavel Penchev Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:35 PM Subject: Re: AxKit for web applications On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Pavel Penchev wrote: > We were using XPathScript - it is a wonderfull tool but in reality > LibXSLT is times faster. This was the main reason we started using XSLT > instead XPS. > > I think some STX that was mentionioned as planned for AxKit 1.7 will be > a great solution :)), even faster than LibXSLT Has this been benchmarked or are you speculating? I would imagine that XSLT will still be faster, just that STX will use less memory. The problem being that STX is lots of method calls, whereas XSLT happens all in C space. -- <!-- Matt --> <:->get a SMart net</:-> Spam trap - do not mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
