On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Pavel Penchev wrote: > We were using XPathScript - it is a wonderfull tool but in reality > LibXSLT is times faster. This was the main reason we started using XSLT > instead XPS. > > I think some STX that was mentionioned as planned for AxKit 1.7 will be > a great solution :)), even faster than LibXSLT
Has this been benchmarked or are you speculating? I would imagine that XSLT will still be faster, just that STX will use less memory. The problem being that STX is lots of method calls, whereas XSLT happens all in C space. -- <!-- Matt --> <:->get a SMart net</:-> Spam trap - do not mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
