On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 12:49 PM, J�rg Walter wrote:
On Tuesday, 18. March 2003 08:45, Chris Leishman wrote:I don't know how AxKit tracks dependancies - but I would have thought
it possible to derive that if the original .xml hadn't changed and the
.xsl hadn't changed, then the output of that translation (the XSP page)
hadn't changed and therefore it wouldn't need to be re-compiled. But
perhaps I'm asking too much ;-)
This is what Matt was referring to when he said I was working on
XSP-after-XSLT. AxKit isn't doing that now, but hopefully will some day. I am
using XSP-after-XSLT a lot anyhow, it's just inefficient for now.
Ah! Cool - someone is working on it. If your interested, you can send me a summary of what your doing and where your up to, and I can see if I can lend a hand sometime.
Regards, Chris
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
