where can I find out more about what an AxKit URI is? and how you make use
of them. I must have missed this in the docs somewhere?

--fess

On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Tod Harter wrote:

> On Tuesday 18 March 2003 01:42 pm, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, John Fessenden wrote:
> > > would it be very hard to write a provider that used an AxKit pipeline
> > > as it's source?
> >
> > Do you mean something like axkit: URI's?
>
> Seems to me thats what he means, and in fact they will give you the ability to
> cache intermediate stages in a pipeline, though at the cost of considerable
> complexity. On the other hand, maybe true full-blown cache at every step
> won't be any easier, so the question is (does AxKit really need extra cache
> functionality given AxKit URLs). Honestly I don't think so. Its a small set
> of cases where you need it anyway.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to