Hi Bill, I would say no, not the same as Jose's for the obvious reason of it being recorded after the one with the missing date. Were Jose's the first record followed by the one above it without date, then you would say the 30th.
Bad habits were hard to break. Heavy fines were handed out. Some priests did margin corrections others didn't. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 16, 2017, at 9:49 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > Thank you Margaret. It is good to know that if a date is not specified it > was likely recorded the same day as the previous record. That hadn't > occurred to me. > > In this case, wouldn't it be 30 Jan since that is the date of Jose's baptism > recorded on the same page? (end of line 7: "...aos trin-ta do ditto mes e > anno") > > Bill > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Azores Genealogy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Azores Genealogy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores.
