Am I wrong that $E- = ZEH:? I will be delighted to see a counter-
example.
Isaac Fried, Boston University
On Mar 21, 2011, at 9:22 PM, George Athas wrote:
Isaac, with respect, that explanation ignores so many different
factors and portrays Hebrew as a machine-like language that is
completely different to all other human languages and resistant to
any influence from outside. Sorry, but it's just far too blinkered.
If Hebrew were spoken by robots on their own planet, you might have
a point. But alas, Hebrew was used by real human beings.
I suggest you read some of Holmstedt's work.
GEORGE ATHAS
Moore Theological College (Sydney, Australia)
www.moore.edu.au
From: Isaac Fried <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:03:32 -0400
To: "Bryant J. Williams III" <[email protected]<mailto:bjwvmw@com-
pair.net>>
Cc: B-Hebrew <[email protected]<mailto:b-
[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Qoheleth
All one needs to know about the attachment $E- ש- is that it is but a
slightly contracted (by the attachment) and slightly retracted ZEH
זה, namely, $E- = ZEH:.
Isaac Fried, Boston University
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
