Isaac Fried:
1. You wrote:  “Namely, Potipar (aSARIYS) who was busy in Pharaoh's court 
supervising the kitchen….
(a) Genesis 39: 1 says that Pa-wa-di -- pr was a SRYS/“officer” of Pharaoh.  
But then it immediately clarifies thatPa-wa-di -- pr was Captain of the Guard, 
that is, in charge of Pharaoh’ssecurity.  Pa-wa-di -- pr had nothing todo with 
Pharaoh’s kitchen.
(b) If we don’t go with the scholarlygambit of gratuitously adding an ayin/( at 
the end of this name [Ugh!], we seethat it ends with pr, which means “house” or 
“great house” in Egyptian.  “Great house” was used on two boundary stelaeat 
Akhenaten’s new capital city to refer to Pharaoh, so it nicely fits a Captainof 
the Guard in charge of Pharaoh’s security. Add in a healthy dose of 
semi-monotheism from the beginning of this name,and one sees that pA-wa-di -- 
pr is the perfect name for a Captain of the Guardduring the Amarna Age, while 
not fitting any other era in human history. 
In that connection, why don’t you seethe vav/W as the second letter in the name 
of Joseph’s Egyptian master, P-W-+  -Y- PR, as being a consonantal vav/W? 
Proper names in the truly ancient Patriarchal narratives don’t use 
plenespelling.
2. You continued:  “[Potipar]…leftthe entire management of his estate to his 
young graceful and able slave(Potifar did not bid on him a goodly sum for 
nothing….”
Yes, that’s correct.
3. But then you added:  “…theMidyanites having very probably turned a handsome 
profit from his sale)”
At Genesis 37: 36 we see:  H-MDN-YM. H- means “the”, and -YM is a standard west 
Semitic plural form.  The people being referenced are MDN, which isthe same as 
the name of one of the sons of Abraham’s Hurrian minor wifeQa-ti-i-ri/QTWR[-H] 
[“Keturah”], all of which sons are sent out east to theHurrian homeland of 
eastern Syria.  WithD and T often not being distinguished in cuneiform writing 
of west Semiticwords or foreign proper names [and with cuneiform being the 
first writtenversion of the Patriarchal narratives], the MDN in the received 
text isactually MTN, being the consonantal rendering in Hebrew defective 
spelling of Mi-ta-ni from the Amarna Letters.  Those traders who took Joseph to 
Egypt areIshmaelites who have become permanent residents of Mitanni, which is 
the sameplace as Naharim/NHRYM at Genesis 24: 10 [the same name, except spelled 
with heth/Xinstead of he/H, as in the Amarna Letters], namely eastern Syria in 
the time ofthe Hurrians in the Late Bronze Age/Patriarchal Age.  Rather than 
non-historical “Midyanites”,they’re historical “Mitannians” in Years 12-14 [the 
exact time periodreferenced at Genesis 14: 4-5].  Notethat  a-l-l  of these 
various proper names make perfectsense in the Amarna Age, while being 
inexplicable otherwise.
4. You continued:  “Joseph ben JacobHA-IBRIY.”
Yes. The phrase “the Hebrews” is H-(BR-YM at Genesis 40: 15.  The tent-dwelling 
Hebrews proudly andaudaciously claimed to be as powerful as the Hurrian lordly 
charioteers whodominated the ruling class of Canaan in Years 12-14.  The 
Hebrews called themselves (BR, which inHurrian means “lord”.  With B and P 
oftennot being distinguished in cuneiform, note that the Hurrian/XTY/xu-ti-ya 
lord who charges Abraham an armand a leg for Sarah’s gravesite has a name with 
the same root:  (PR, at Genesis 23: 8.  [The full name, adding the -WN 
classicHurrian suffix, is (PR-WN.]  The Hebrewsproudly called themselves 
“lords”, using a Hurrian-based name for themselves.  That nomenclature makes 
perfect sense in theAmarna Age, which is the Patriarchal Age when Hurrian 
charioteers dominated theruling class of Canaan, while not making sense in any 
other historical timeperiod.
5. You continued:  “Potipar had suchcomplete a trust in Joseph that he did not 
intervene naught in his doings,their only point of contact being an occasional 
tete-a-tete lunch, possibly anelegant vegetarian meal at the classy 
Ritz-on-the-Nile.”
No, Pa-wa-di -- pr let Joseph take careof managing his domestic estate, with 
Pa-wa-di -- pr simply eating the food athis own house that Joseph made sure was 
available, without having to worry aboutother matters concerning his domestic 
estate. That allowed Pa-wa-di -- pr to focus on his all-important job of 
tryingto figure out which of Pharaoh’s officers was committing treason.  At 
Joseph’s suggestion, as I mentioned in myprior post, Pa-wa-di -- pr decided to 
sneak young Joseph into the jail wherewere being held the two suspected 
officials of “Pharaoh”.   [“Pharaoh”= P-R(  -H = pA ra plus Semiticizing 
-H,with Akhenaten being the king of Egypt who semi-monotheistically honored 
pAra:  the one and only god Ra.  Every name fits the Amarna Age/PatriarchalAge, 
while being out of place in any other time period.]  Pa-wa-di -- pr’s plan was 
that Joseph mightoverhear what the Cup Bearer and the Baker [who may be 
historical Panhesy] weresaying, and thus help figure out which one of them was 
guilty.  The pretext was that the master’s wife wassupposedly upset with 
Joseph, but that was a mere ruse to insinuate Joseph intothat jail.  As I 
mentioned in my priorpost, Joseph showed unbelievable chutzpah in 
ostentatiously having thetwo prisoners go over to his master’s house (Genesis 
40: 7), where he grandlyinterprets their dreams to one and all. Then in his 
master’s presence, at his master’s own house, Josephbrazenly asks the innocent 
Cup Bearer at Genesis 40: 14 to tell Pharaoh to freeJoseph from his master’s 
house!  That’s chutzpah.
6.  In closing, perhaps I might note that thePatriarchal narratives end exactly 
the way they began.  The favorite son [Haran, Joseph], who is thefirstborn son 
of his father’s favorite main wife, unfortunately dies in aforeign land, in the 
presence of his father’s descendants [MWLDT].  Same. Haran doesn’t even survive 
his own father, and correspondingly Josephdoesn’t survive a single one of his 
10 older half-brothers.  You see, a firstborn favorite son [who was asuccessor 
princeling in the valley] historically gave the first Hebrews no endof grief in 
Year 14.  That’s why each andevery favorite son and each and every firstborn 
son gets the shaft and properlyso in the Patriarchal narratives.
Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois



_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

Reply via email to