Petr: On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Petr Tomasek <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 08:00:13PM -0700, K Randolph wrote: > … > > > > > Look at Genesis 27:29 there is both WY$XW and WY$XWW for plurals, and in > > Genesis 43:28 there’s WY$TXW. Both cases, the Masoretes gave an assumed > > Qere for a Kethiv, is there any evidence from the DSS that the Qere is > > correct? If not, then stick with the Kethiv. > > I think this is methodologically very questionable procedure. > Why? I find the vast majority of Qere readings incorrect, so why should I treat these differently? Especially when the Kethiv readings make sense? > > Petr Tomasek > Karl W. Randolph.
_______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
