Hi Hauke,
On Tuesday 05 June 2012 23:55:02 Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> This workaround should be triggered based on the chipid and rev and not
> the core id and rev. This is based on code in the Broadcom SDK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <ha...@hauke-m.de>
> ---
> drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
b/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
> index da8769e..dd2b55d 100644
> --- a/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ static void bcma_pmu_workarounds(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
> void bcma_pmu_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
> {
> u32 pmucap;
> + struct bcma_bus *bus = cc->core->bus;
>
> pmucap = bcma_cc_read32(cc, BCMA_CC_PMU_CAP);
> cc->pmu.rev = (pmucap & BCMA_CC_PMU_CAP_REVISION);
> @@ -180,7 +181,7 @@ void bcma_pmu_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
> bcma_cc_set32(cc, BCMA_CC_PMU_CTL,
> BCMA_CC_PMU_CTL_NOILPONW);
>
> - if (cc->core->id.id == 0x4329 && cc->core->id.rev == 2)
> + if (bus->chipinfo.id == 0x4329 && bus->chipinfo.rev == 2)
> pr_err("Fix for 4329b0 bad LPOM state not implemented!\n");
Does not that deserve a new define to be in line with your previous patch?
--
Florian
_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
