On 06/06/2012 10:08 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Hauke,
>
> On Tuesday 05 June 2012 23:55:02 Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> This workaround should be triggered based on the chipid and rev and not
>> the core id and rev. This is based on code in the Broadcom SDK.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <ha...@hauke-m.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
> b/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
>> index da8769e..dd2b55d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
>> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ static void bcma_pmu_workarounds(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
>> void bcma_pmu_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
>> {
>> u32 pmucap;
>> + struct bcma_bus *bus = cc->core->bus;
>>
>> pmucap = bcma_cc_read32(cc, BCMA_CC_PMU_CAP);
>> cc->pmu.rev = (pmucap & BCMA_CC_PMU_CAP_REVISION);
>> @@ -180,7 +181,7 @@ void bcma_pmu_init(struct bcma_drv_cc *cc)
>> bcma_cc_set32(cc, BCMA_CC_PMU_CTL,
>> BCMA_CC_PMU_CTL_NOILPONW);
>>
>> - if (cc->core->id.id == 0x4329 && cc->core->id.rev == 2)
>> + if (bus->chipinfo.id == 0x4329 && bus->chipinfo.rev == 2)
>> pr_err("Fix for 4329b0 bad LPOM state not implemented!\n");
>
> Does not that deserve a new define to be in line with your previous patch?
> --
> Florian
Probably we can remove this completely. The BCM4329 is a fullmac chip
mostly used in phones and this part is done in the firmware.
Hauke
_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
