> What exactly are you suggesting? Babeld should not set unreachable when > removing routes? I have always wondered about that specific behavior of > babeld.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-05#section-3.5.5 _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
