On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:01 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> writes: > > >>>> Received prefix with no router id. > >>>> Couldn't parse packet (8, 13) from fe80::eea8:6bff:fefe:9a2 on enp6s0. > >>>> Received prefix with no router id. > >>>> Couldn't parse packet (8, 14) from fe80::eea8:6bff:fefe:9a2 on enp6s0. > >>> > >>> Toke, are you mis-parsing retractions? No router-id is necessary for > >>> a retraction. > > > >> Weren't these messages in the babeld log? > > > > My bad. Yeah, sorry. > > Hmm, we did actually fix a bug a few months ago where Bird would send > out v4 routes even though it didn't have a next hop for it. The fix is > in commit caa9d03d65ce827ce536d54b26988e70767e032f. > > Dave, are you sure you're running the latest git version of Bird?
I pulled and built and played with your int-new branch which has that commit in it. I backed off on using it while I climb roofs. I ran into some issues (possibly historical related to some tweaks of things like txcost elsewhere in the net), and I decided it made more sense to get the core routers to the same babeld on one set of compilers and a common set of OSes before testing interop further. 3 replaced, 3 to go, a half dozen machines in the lab. > > -Toke -- Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619 _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
