On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 8:23 AM Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What exactly are you suggesting? Babeld should not set unreachable when > > removing routes? I have always wondered about that specific behavior of > > babeld. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-05#section-3.5.5
In case we're all talking past each other - that section refers to babel's internal infinite metric. Expressing that into the kernel, it seems far saner to keep the current kernel metric (as bird and FRR) do, and just mark the route as unreachable as it is a separate property. (You can't do an atomic update on both unreach and metric at the same time) (as best as I recall, actually, the quagga version marked that route as a blackhole by default, same metric) > > _______________________________________________ > Babel-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users -- Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619 _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
