On 2012-08-02, Gregoire Henry wrote:
> Then, on a late night, I probably forgot to implement another filtering 
> mechanism. I don't know yet what to do:
>
> - revert the patch and don't use atomic route change on OS X (and probably 
> old BSD)
> - implement another filtering mechanism (by comparing each route to the babel 
> internal routing table ? by accepting only routes with a static flag ?)

Well, just to make things a bit more confusing - things are stable again
here with the patch in. The routes don't have the #2 flag yet do not get
added back into babel.

No idea what's going on.

A.

-- 
feature, n: a documented bug | bug, n: an undocumented feature
                        - Mario S F Ferreira <[email protected]>

Attachment: pgpiaoi0OjPKE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Babel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users

Reply via email to