> - revert the patch and don't use atomic route change on OS X (and > probably old BSD)
That's what I would prefer. > - implement another filtering mechanism (by comparing each route to > the babel internal routing table ? That won't work -- think about what happens when there's a static and Babel route that are identical (not unlikely if the default route is obtained over multiple protocols). > by accepting only routes with a static flag ?) Too limiting, IMHO. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
