On 2012-08-02, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2012-08-02, Gregoire Henry wrote:
>> Then, on a late night, I probably forgot to implement another filtering 
>> mechanism. I don't know yet what to do:
>>
>> - revert the patch and don't use atomic route change on OS X (and probably 
>> old BSD)
>> - implement another filtering mechanism (by comparing each route to the 
>> babel internal routing table ? by accepting only routes with a static flag ?)
>
> Well, just to make things a bit more confusing - things are stable again
> here with the patch in. The routes don't have the #2 flag yet do not get
> added back into babel.
>
> No idea what's going on.

Sight, sorry about the noise - it was just a matter of time before it
broke again.

A.

-- 
It is better to sit alone than in company with the bad; and it is better
still to sit with the good than alone. It better to speak to a seeker of
knowledge than to remain silent; but silence is better than idle words.
                        - Imam Bukhari

Attachment: pgpPvmNVcPCNd.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Babel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users

Reply via email to