As I said in a previous email, as well as the legal differences, there is a big ethical difference; with one I don't deprive the original owner of use of their property the other is theft.
Vijay. On 30/10/2007, Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andy wrote: > > Copyright Infringement is NOT theft, theft is theft, copyright > > infringement is copyright infringement. They are covered by entirely > > separate laws, they are described differently in the law, and the > > actions themselves differ greatly. > > > > How can educated people confuse the two? > > I assume that they consider the difference to be immaterial, and value > emotive language over accuracy. > > S > - > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please > visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. > Unofficial > list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ >
