Brian Butterworth wrote:
> Givem the original is at 25fps, why not encode at that in fact?

50fps. ;-)  (Pedantic, but important...)

S
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to