Martin Deutsch wrote:
On Nov 18, 2007 11:43 PM, Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:Brian Butterworth wrote: > Givem the original is at 25fps, why not encode at that in fact? 50fps. ;-) (Pedantic, but important...)Surely that just depends on whether your f stands for fields or frames?
Two fields != one frame. I ranted about this back in August if anyone cares sufficiently...
http://elvum.net/web-log/item/18/catid/3 S - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
