On Nov 18, 2007 11:43 PM, Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Brian Butterworth wrote:
> > Givem the original is at 25fps, why not encode at that in fact?
>
> 50fps. ;-)  (Pedantic, but important...)


Surely that just depends on whether your f stands for fields or frames?

 - martin

Reply via email to