On Thursday 29 November 2007 10:32:36 David Greaves wrote: > However, clear case law is given in the paper which shows that > since the email you have received is an unpublished work (sending private > correspondence doesn't count as "publishing")
I thought there was a case in the UK where it was determined to be publishing because you don't know the owners necessarily of intermediate email systems. I can't cite a reference because its a vague memory from around 10 years ago. Also, emails on a mailing list would almost certainly count as publishing even without that ruling. Michael. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
