Surely not? On 7/4/08, Michael (surely) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 04 July 2008 20:13:07 Dan Brickley wrote: >> I propose a six-week moratorium on the use of the word 'surely' in this >> debate. > > Surely, the way to surley eliminate the use of the word surely, one and > surely > for all is to (surely) overuse it as surely and to the best of our ability, > surely, inorder to surely eliminate it from use, lest one surely, be shown > to > be of surely weak mind and thought for surely using a word that surely > presumes too much about their own position, surely ? > > Surely best regards, > > ;) > > Michael. > (surely personal opinion) > - > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please > visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. > Unofficial list archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ >
-- Sent from Google Mail for mobile | mobile.google.com Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/peeebeee - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
