Surely not?

On 7/4/08, Michael (surely) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 04 July 2008 20:13:07 Dan Brickley wrote:
>> I propose a six-week moratorium on the use of the word 'surely' in this
>> debate.
>
> Surely, the way to surley eliminate the use of the word surely, one and
> surely
> for all is to (surely) overuse it as surely and to the best of our ability,
> surely, inorder to surely eliminate it from use, lest one surely, be shown
> to
> be of surely weak mind and thought for surely using a word that surely
> presumes too much about their own position, surely ?
>
> Surely best regards,
>
> ;)
>
> Michael.
> (surely personal opinion)
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
> Unofficial list archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>

-- 
Sent from Google Mail for mobile | mobile.google.com

Peter Bowyer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/peeebeee
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

Reply via email to