"Ofcom's letter to DTT industry stakeholders inviting comments" To me, that's not the quite the same thing as a "public debate" on the issue.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 09:27, Andrew Bowden <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] > > On Behalf Of Scot McSweeney-Roberts > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 19:07, Nick Reynolds-FM&T > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > that's why there's a public consultation > > Where? There doesn't seem to be anything related on ofcom's site > > > http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/?open=Yes§or=Broadcasting%20 > -%20TV<http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/?open=Yes§or=Broadcasting%20%0A-%20TV> > > You'd think they'd be the ones doing the consulting. > > > This is from an Ofcom email sent on their updates mailing list: > > "Ofcom has today published a letter from BBC Free to View Ltd concerning > its licence for DTT Multiplex B. A modification to the licence would > allow Ofcom and the BBC to agree the BBC's proposal to compress service > information text on the Multiplex. The BBC's letter, alongside Ofcom's > letter to DTT industry stakeholders inviting comments by 16 September > 2009, can be found here > http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/ifi/tvlicensing/enquiry/"; > > > > > - > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please > visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. > Unofficial list archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >
