On 9-Oct-2009, at 00:21, David Tomlinson wrote:
For obvious reasons I do not wish to discuss children as a subject
anymore.
It’s not obvious at all. People need to stop with the nervousness when
the words “children” and “photograph” appear in a sentence together;
it’s, for want of a better term, childish and ridiculous.
It’s also pretty salient, given it’s a straightforward example of a
copyright-holder having a current ability to exercise control without
having to resort to onerous trust mechanisms.
Your position has a distinct lack of great upsides as compared to the
status quo, but it -does- have some significant flaws, and I say that
retaining the view that copyright as it exists today is flawed in some
fairly serious ways.
M.
--
mo mcroberts
http://nevali.net
iChat: mo.mcrobe...@me.com Jabber/GTalk: m...@ilaven.net Twitter:
@nevali
Run Leopard or Snow Leopard? Set Quick Look free with DropLook -
http://labs.jazzio.com/DropLook/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
