On 14-Oct-2009, at 13:45, Stephen Jolly wrote:
On 14 Oct 2009, at 12:23, Mo McRoberts wrote:
I think the document I linked to implies a more flexible picture
than that.
It doesn’t.
There's stuff in section 2.7 that talks about the flexibility
manufacturers would have to change the appearance of the core UI (up
to a point), which to me implies more flexibility than a simple
choice between Canvas UI and Canvas branding or neither.
My reading of it (taken in the context of the earlier sections which
were quite explicit about which parts were readily-modified and which
weren’t) suggested that there was only very limited flexibility there…
though re-reading it I can see it’s a bit ambiguous and where you’re
coming from. Hmm.
(Of course, if there was no JV and minimal UI specification, it’d be a
moot point… ;)
M.
--
mo mcroberts
http://nevali.net
iChat: [email protected] Jabber/GTalk: [email protected] Twitter:
@nevali
Run Leopard or Snow Leopard? Set Quick Look free with DropLook -
http://labs.jazzio.com/DropLook/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
