Anthony J Biacco wrote: > Ntbackup does save more information. It takes an entire backup of the > storage group and its structure (including things like the public folder > store). It will allow you to restore them directly to the information > store as-is (or even to a recovery storage group). > Now you'll probably ask, well, why not use ntbackup to do incremental > backups of Exchange too? And the answer is, it doesn't do that, > unfortunately. > In all actuality, you'd probably want a more robust backup solution for > things as critical as Exchange, that will do per-message restore, blah > blah, but chances are if you're on this list, as I am, you probably > don't have that kind of budget. > > -Tony > Correct about the budget thing. Also, I'd rather spend the money to get rid of Exchange than to work around its problems. (Thinking of implementing Samba/LDAP authentication with an IMAP email server on Linux).
-Rob ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
