Anthony J Biacco wrote:
> Ntbackup does save more information. It takes an entire backup of the
> storage group and its structure (including things like the public folder
> store). It will allow you to restore them directly to the information
> store as-is (or even to a recovery storage group).
> Now you'll probably ask, well, why not use ntbackup to do incremental
> backups of Exchange too? And the answer is, it doesn't do that,
> unfortunately.
> In all actuality, you'd probably want a more robust backup solution for
> things as critical as Exchange, that will do per-message restore, blah
> blah, but chances are if you're on this list, as I am, you probably
> don't have that kind of budget.
>
> -Tony
>   
Correct about the budget thing.  Also, I'd rather spend the money to get
rid of Exchange than to work around its problems.  (Thinking of
implementing Samba/LDAP authentication with an IMAP email server on Linux).

-Rob

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to