On 20/09/2007, Stephen Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use 'mount' instead of checking for directory existence to determine if the
> filesystem is mounted and return the corresponding exit status? (if
> backuppc has created the directory structure on the main drive instead of
> a mounted one, it's safe to remove inside the script. Use 'rm' on each
> level working your way up, NOT 'rm -rf' on the parent, if you're paranoid
> or don't fully trust your script.)
>
> Or am I misunderstanding the problem?

I think the problem is that MacOS X uses an automounter, and what BackupPC
is doing (viz. creating the directory before calling the checks) is creating a
situation where the automounter *always* mounts the drive in the wrong place.
So no amount of checks is going to work because the config is guaranteed to
be wrong.
-- 
cheers,
-ambrose

Yahoo and Gmail must die. Yes, I use them, but they still must die.
PS: Don't trust everything you read in Wikipedia. (Very Important)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to