Stephen,

On Sep 20, 2007, at 8:18 PM, Stephen Joyce wrote:

> Use 'mount' instead of checking for directory existence to  
> determine if the filesystem is mounted and return the corresponding  
> exit status? (if backuppc has created the directory structure on  
> the main drive instead of a mounted one, it's safe to remove inside  
> the script. Use 'rm' on each level working your way up, NOT 'rm - 
> rf' on the parent, if you're paranoid or don't fully trust your  
> script.)
>
> Or am I misunderstanding the problem?
>

Hey, that's a good idea.  You certainly did not misunderstand the  
problem, and I believe that will work.  I do wish that there was a  
way to prevent backuppc from even creating the filesystem in the  
first place, but having a script clean it up is ok.

I would get nervous that it would somehow delete my whole backup tree  
though - is there a way using a simple shell script to determine the  
size of the contents of a directory?  Certainly my backups would be  
larger than 1 MB, and the default file structure for backuppc is  
quite small, so I could just not delete anything if the directory  
contains > 1 MB of data, and somehow alert myself about the problem.

Thoughts?

Thanks!

-- Kimball 

> Cheers, Stephen
> --
> Stephen Joyce
> Systems Administrator                                            P  
> A N I C
> Physics & Astronomy Department                         Physics &  
> Astronomy
> University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill         Network  
> Infrastructure
> voice: (919) 962-7214                                        and  
> Computing
> fax: (919) 962-0480                               http:// 
> www.panic.unc.edu
>
>  Some people make the world turn and others just watch it spin.
>    -- Jimmy Buffet
>
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Kimball Larsen wrote:
>
>> Ok, I've done a bunch more research into this, and discovered the  
>> problem:
>>
>> backuppc creates the target directories for the backup destination  
>> BEFORE it calls BackupPC_dump, so my pre conditions are always  
>> returning true, because BackupPC just created the necessary file  
>> structure.
>>
>> So, I'm looking for either a) where is the check that decides to  
>> create the file structure before doing a dump or b) how to re- 
>> arrange my setup so that backupPC just fails if the destination  
>> for the backup does not exist.
>>
>> Again, here's my setup:
>>
>> /Volumes/Honker <-- this is an external hard drive that is only  
>> mounted periodically.  When it is not mounted, /Volumes does NOT  
>> have a "Honker" directory.
>>
>>
>> here's with my external drive disconnected:
>> MainEngineering:/Volumes root# pwd
>> /Volumes
>> MainEngineering:/Volumes root# ls -la
>> total 8
>> drwxrwxrwt    3 root  admin   102 Sep 20 14:57 .
>> drwxr-xr-x   31 root  wheel  1156 Sep 18 12:21 ..
>> lrwxr-xr-x    1 root  admin     1 Sep 18 12:21 Guido -> /
>> MainEngineering:/Volumes root#
>>
>>
>> and again with it connected:
>> MainEngineering:/Volumes root# ls -la
>> total 8
>> drwxrwxrwt    4 root     admin     136 Sep 20 14:58 .
>> drwxr-xr-x   31 root     wheel    1156 Sep 18 12:21 ..
>> lrwxr-xr-x    1 root     admin       1 Sep 18 12:21 Guido -> /
>> drwxr-xr-x    8 unknown  unknown   374 Sep 20 14:45 Honker
>> MainEngineering:/Volumes root#
>>
>>
>> The problem is that if a Honker directory exists in /Volumes, then  
>> when I attach the drive, it mounts as Honker-1, so my backups  
>> don't get to the right file system.
>>
>> Help!
>>
>> -- Kimball
>> On Sep 20, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Kimball Larsen wrote:
>>
>>> (Sorry for the re-post - I realized I forgot to put on a subject  
>>> last time)
>>> Hokay, I'm stuck.  I give.  I need help.
>>> The documentation for UserCmdCheckStatus says:
>>>
>>>    "Whether the exit status of each PreUserCmd and PostUserCmd is  
>>> checked.
>>>
>>>    "If set and the Dump/Restore/Archive Pre/Post UserCmd returns  
>>> a non-zero exit status then the dump/restore/archive is aborted.  
>>> To maintain backward compatibility (where the exit status in  
>>> early versions was always ignored), this flag defaults to 0.
>>>
>>>    "If this flag is set and the Dump/Restore/Archive PreUserCmd  
>>> fails then the matching Dump/Restore/Archive PostUserCmd is not  
>>> executed. If DumpPreShareCmd returns a non-exit status, then  
>>> DumpPostShareCmd is not executed, but the DumpPostUserCmd is  
>>> still run (since DumpPreUserCmd must have previously succeeded).
>>>
>>>    "An example of a DumpPreUserCmd that might fail is a script  
>>> that snapshots or dumps a database which fails because of some  
>>> database error."
>>> Simple enough - so I wrote a script to verify that the location  
>>> to which I am about to try to backup actually exists (I'm backing  
>>> up to a removable drive that does get removed, from time to time,  
>>> and I only want the backups to run when the drive is attached).   
>>> Then I set this script to the value for the various Pre conditions:
>>> $Conf{DumpPreUserCmd} = '$sshPath -q -x -l kimball $host /usr/ 
>>> local/bin/checkHonker';
>>> $Conf{DumpPostUserCmd} = undef;
>>> $Conf{DumpPreShareCmd} = '$sshPath -q -x -l kimball $host /usr/ 
>>> local/bin/checkHonker';
>>> $Conf{DumpPostShareCmd} = undef;
>>> $Conf{RestorePreUserCmd} = '$sshPath -q -x -l kimball $host /usr/ 
>>> local/bin/checkHonker';
>>> $Conf{RestorePostUserCmd} = undef;
>>> $Conf{ArchivePreUserCmd} = '$sshPath -q -x -l kimball $host /usr/ 
>>> local/bin/checkHonker';
>>> $Conf{ArchivePostUserCmd} = undef;
>>> and I set it to check the status of the user commands:
>>> $Conf{UserCmdCheckStatus} = 1;
>>> But it still runs the backup (and writes over my mount point for  
>>> my external drive)
>>> I've verified that the script returns a non-zero when the drive  
>>> is not present:
>>> sillyHost:~ backuppc$ /usr/bin/ssh -q -x -l kimball 192.168.0.21 / 
>>> usr/local/bin/checkHonker
>>> Checking for Honker
>>> Honker NOT mounted
>>> sillyHost:~ backuppc $ echo $?
>>> 1
>>> What am I missing?
>>> -- Kimball
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> -----
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> BackupPC-users mailing list
>>> BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
>>> http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to