Hello Hendrik, Am Sonntag, den 07.10.2007, 14:57 +0200 schrieb Hendrik Friedel:
> I noticed something else, though: The moment I start the backup, the > free-mem drops to 6MB (from 400MB; I have 512MB). This might be the > bottleneck, don't you think? My backup host uses the double amount of RAM but I don't see a reason why only 512 mb should be such a performance killer. > I'd rather not switch to SMB, yet. Maybe, you could comment on the above > first. It was quite a problem for me setting backuppc up the way it is now. > Never change a running system ;-) > Maybe debugging localhost already helps. If you insist, I'll switch to SMB > though ;-) To say it short: I have no idea what could be your problem with the backuppc server - switching to smb was only an idea that - maybe - leads to a faster backup (but this can't be the explanation as your local backup is slow, too). Sorry, I don't think that I can give you a useful hint for a solution, maybe another list user can help you with this topic. Renke -- rbrausse ferdinand-kopf-str 7 79117 freiburg +497613845491 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
