Toni Van Remortel wrote: > Anyway, I'm preparing a separate test setup now, to be able to do > correct tests (so both BackupPC and an rsync tree are using data from > the same time). > Test results will be here tomorrow. > So that is today.
BackupPC full dump, with patch which removed --ignore-times for a full backup: Done: 507 files, 50731819 bytes full backup complete real 13m39.796s user 0m4.232s sys 0m0.556s Network IO used: 620MB 'rsync -auvH --ignore-times' on the same data: sent 48 bytes received 108845 bytes 72595.33 bytes/sec total size is 54915491 speedup is 504.31 real 0m16.978s user 0m0.480s sys 0m0.468s Network IO used: 12.5MB Big difference. -- Toni Van Remortel Linux System Engineer @ Precision Operations NV +32 3 451 92 26 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
