On 29/09/11 10:28 PM, Adam Goryachev wrote: > Can I assume this is because the new HDD's perform better than the old? > In other words, would it be safe to assume you would get even better > performance using RAID10 with the new HDD's than you are getting with RAID6?
Yes, the new drives are several generations newer. If i went with Raid10 again, I would need 8 drives instead of 6. Either way, the system keeps up with backups, so performance wasn't much of an issue, I just plain ran out of space on the old array. Also, with 6-8 drives, I can lose any two, vs the remote possibility of losing the wrong two on Raid10, as touched on by other replies. I'm still looking forward to backuppc 4.x with its removal of hardlinks.. there's nearly 14 million directories and 150 million hardlinks on this array and that definitely slows the system down. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
