On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Mike Dresser wrote: > On 29/09/11 10:28 PM, Adam Goryachev wrote: > > Can I assume this is because the new HDD's perform better than the old? > > In other words, would it be safe to assume you would get even better > > performance using RAID10 with the new HDD's than you are getting with RAID6? > > Yes, the new drives are several generations newer. If i went with > Raid10 again, I would need 8 drives instead of 6.
With Raid10, as you say, you need more drives than Raid 6. That increases the likelihood of having multiple drive failures. Slightly different RPMs from the different generations of disks in your Raid10 as someone else suggested, might introduce resonances in your enclosure that would cause more vibration than identical drives. It's all too tricky. I'm going back to clay tablets. -- Tim Connors ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
