Le 15/10/2012 17:05, Les Mikesell a écrit : > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Frédéric Massot > <frede...@juliana-multimedia.com> wrote: >> >> The problem is that the original file system (ext4) has no inode >> available and increasing the size of an ext4 file system does not >> increase the number of the inode. To have no more inode problem the new >> filesystem is xfs, so I can not copy data with dd. > > Just curious: does the content you back up consist mostly of tiny > files without much duplication? It seems odd to run out of inodes > while still having substantial disk space.
I used the command "df -i" on different servers to see those who ate a lot of inode, and it seems that it is the web server with Apache cache enabled. Is that one inode is used by one directory? I'll use the "-t" option of htcacheclean to remove empty directory, and see if it makes a difference. On a web server most affected: $ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/vda1 92G 52G 36G 60% / $ df -i Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on /dev/vda1 6111232 4391859 1719373 72% / And the folder "/var/cache/apache2/mod_disk_cache" contains 2956954 directories to 13 GB. The limit of the total disk cache size (-l option) is 300 MB ?! Regards. -- ============================================== | FRÉDÉRIC MASSOT | | http://www.juliana-multimedia.com | | mailto:frede...@juliana-multimedia.com | | +33.(0)2.97.54.77.94 +33.(0)6.67.19.95.69 | ===========================Debian=GNU/Linux=== ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
