On 10/08 03:01 , Frédéric Massot wrote: > I thought I would increase the size of the new file system, but my > concern is not having the same problem with a lack of inode in a few years. > > From what I've read, if I chose XFS instead of ext4, I would not have > this problem of lack of inode.
Correct. > 10 Gb for /, using ext4, 26% used > > 4 GB RAM, I'll add more RAM for XFS > > > 10GB swap > > 4 GB swap on logical volume, with new disks I will increase the size of > the swap. > > > remainder of space in a separate partition mounted on /var/lib/backuppc. > > BackupPC data are already in their own logical volume. :o) Sounds good. -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
