Thank you both for the response. 1) Speed: This laptop goes 2.5GHz wifi only, so it can be like 10x slower 2) V4 speed: This I have to still test, as for now I live in v3-world. I am just trying v4 make it work... O:-) 3) Two hosts trick - I was thinking of this, it is just messy...
So to make v4 work first :-) Cheers, Jan On 12/30/18 2:46 PM, Guillermo Rozas wrote: > However, the main question: The backups over the cable are obviously > > faster, > > > How much faster? In my experience, the backups are more limited by disk > speed and cpu power than network. But I'm connected to the server via > either AC wifi or wired gigabit, so YMMV. > > Be careful that the FIRST backup is always slow because of the full > backup network transfer, but afterwards network use should be minimal > for a slowly changing backup. > > but for incrementals, it is not that big issue. > > > Are you sure? On V4 using rsync (recommended on Linux) the only > difference between incrementals and fulls is the way the file changes > are checked. There shouldn't be big transfer differences unless you have > big files that change checksum but not size or modification time (wich > is the usual case for encrypted containers). > > Cheers, > Guillermo > > > _______________________________________________ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
