On Saturday 22 December 2007 17:06, Frank Sweetser wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Saturday 22 December 2007 15:37, Frank Sweetser wrote: > >> Kern Sibbald wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I would appreciate it if all the beta testers would test the current > >>> Branch-2.2. against the regression scripts. The two maxvol tests are > >>> expected to fail. > >> > >> Just to double check, should we be testing /branches/Branch-2.2/bacula > >> against /branches/Branch-2.2/regress or /trunk/regress ? And if the > >> former, it just needs a quick patch to configure and compile correctly > > > > That patch is already included in the 2.2 Branch so the regression > > scripts > > You may want to double check that that particular commit made it, as > sourceforge has a different opinion. > > http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bacula/branches/Branch-2.2/regress >/scripts/regress-config?revision=5720&view=markup > > shows configure still being called with '--archivedir'.
Oh, sorry, I totally forgot about running the 2.2 branch regression tests. I always run regressions from the trunk. There only once or twice I all of Bacula history did we have incompatible regression tests from the old branch and the trunk. I'll update the 2.2 branch regress so that it is current with the trunk in the next few hours. In the mean time, I suggest that you use Branch-2.2 source, but the trunk regression scripts ... Kern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
