On Sunday 23 December 2007 04:55, Frank Sweetser wrote: > Okay, I have some more debug info. I re-ran the test on a different > system, a Fedora 7 one. The output of the test with REGRESS_DEBUG=1 was > the same, but this time it was able to generate a gdb backtrace. I don't > know if the backtrace wasn't being generated due to a Fedora 8 quick or if > it's just a problem on this particular system yet, but hopefully the > backtrace will shed some more light on the problem.
Thanks for the debug info. It looks like something is going wrong in the printf routine, possibly because you have longer path names than most regression testers. Though I cannot completely exclude it yet, I don't think that it is anything related to Fedora. I'm made a small tweak to the bsnprintf.c routine that may fix the problem (I give it about 20% probability of resolving the problem), and I have committed it to Branch-2.2, so could you update your branch source code and then run the tests/migration-job-test again? If it continues to fail, either you will need to run the debugger by hand to get a bit more information for me, or I'll need to be able to login to the system to run it myself. This is a bug that I would definitely like to eliminate before releasing the next version. Best regards, Kern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
