David, 

It seems to me that one of the values of 'engagement' and its briefish
period in Baha'i Law, is so that commitment can be ensured on the one
hand but, if not forthcoming, neither party is restricted from other
prospects for too long a period, on the other. 
Stages of relationships toward marriage might be: 
1 multiple friendships of both genders and across age groups, developed
through community activity eg study, business, arts, service, worship.
2. developing an ability to assess the characters of those friends.
3. recognising deeper feelings for a member of the opposite gender.
4. (the difficult bit) speaking with that other to ascertain whether any
similar feelings might exist;
5. confiding with other friends and family about each other's interest
so as to create avenues for occasions of getting to know more fully the
character of each other, through privacy and confidences;
6. engagement if it gets that far.

I think courtship in the Baha'i Faith covers all of these stages for any
Baha'i over the age of maturity (15) and that it should be explicitly
understood in the community that much behaviour that youth exhibit is
automatically going to be related to courtship behaviour. Youth over
this age therefore require constant guidance and support about their
relationships with the other gender. Touching and much body language is,
even if subconciously, part of courtship behaviour, and shouldn't be
condoned until stage 5, and then only discreetly. Certainly we can do
with some courses on courtship behaviours, how to recognise them, and
what to do about them. Especially as they often happen among the older
youth as well(the over 50s). We all want those grandchildren. We just
want them under the best of circumstances. 

Regards
Owen
  

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Friedman
Sent: Sunday, 27 July 2003 9:04 PM
To: Baha'i Studies
Subject: Baha'i courtship


I am interested to know how courtship might be seen from a Baha'i 
standpoint.  My understanding is that relationships don't have to be 
'official' before engagement.  There doesn't have to be any mention of
being 
boyfriend and girlfriend or any sort of committment made.  It could be
the 
case that there were times when feelings were made obvious, but I don't
know 
that there has to be anything prior to engagement that would make it
clear 
that they like each other as more than just friends.  I have heard of
many 
cases where Baha'i friends suddenly announced their engagement.  The
idea of 
"going steady" doesn't sound Baha'i to me, because, as I understand, it 
implies that you don't do things with other people of the opposite sex
even 
as friends.  Not being able to see someone else of the opposite sex and
do 
activities just as a friend seems a selfish request.  I would think that

prior to when you become engaged (or at least the moment you decide
someone 
is the person for you, and that you want to be with them for the rest of

your life) NO COMMITTMENT should be made.  Relationships today often
involve 
some sort of committment in a relationship at a time when the couple
have 
not settled on each other as their spouse.  My understanding is that as
a 
Baha'i the only committment should be to marriage.  Prior to becoming 
convinced that a particular person is good enough, anyone of the
opposite 
sex is still in the running, and it may be that your potential spouse
turns 
out not to cut the mustard.  I don't see how a committment could have
any 
meaning for a Baha'i.  If you are committing to someone it's like you
owe 
them something, but if you don't know that you'll want to marry them,
what 
are you committing to?  I'm not entirely sure that exclusive
relationships, 
i.e. "couples," where there is a girlfriend and a boyfriend, is what is 
required of Baha'is.  Since I don't see what someone who is merely a 
potential spouse is owed, I don't know that a relationship involving two

people is a requirement.  I think that a person could see more than one 
person of the opposite sex.  The problem here is that in society today
it's 
probably going to be assumed to be "a date" if one asks one of the
opposite 
sex if they want to do something.  If it's taken as a date it would also
be 
taken as the usual boyfriend-girlfriend relationship.  If the person who

asked then asks someone else to do something, it could get back to the
other 
person, who might then see the person as being unfaithful.  I don't
think 
that would be the problem of the person who asked.  I guess it's just
how 
things are today.  Having said this, if one were becoming pretty certain

that a particular person was good enough to marry it would not be the
best 
time to ask another person of the opposite sex to do something.  The
former 
could be good enough, and it could give rise to misunderstandings and
result 
in a split.  Anyway, I'm not sure that a "relationship," defined in the 
normal way, is the way to go.  Such involve "romance," with sultry
looks, 
roses, and talk about how they are the best thing you ever came across,
and 
how you were nobody before you met them.  I'm not quite sure what Baha'i

romance is supposed to be like, or when it is allowed.  I'm sure you are

allowed to tell a person you love them prior to engagement, and I don't
see 
any objection to flowers or chocolates.  I'm not sure how, without doing

something dishonest that would mislead people (like asking two people of
the 
opposite sex to be your boyfriend/girlfriend, which they are going to
take 
to mean that they have a unique relationship with you that no one else
has), 
a Baha'i would be unfaithful by seeing two people at once.  As I see it,

prior to engagement the two can be considered friends.  I think the 
implication today is that on becoming boyfriend and girlfriend neither 
should be looking out for others.  It could happen that someone else
better 
presents themself, but you would not be trying to look for others.  From
a 
Baha'i standpoint I don't know that it would be the same if two people 
started seeing each other.  If it's not an exclusive relationship, and
the 
two really don't know if the other person will be good enough, they can
have 
their eyes wide open to others they might see.

Just my take on the issue.  No doubt I'll receive some useful replies on

this.

Regards,
David

_________________________________________________________________
Surf the net and talk on the phone with Xtra Jetstream @  
http://www.xtra.co.nz/products/0,,5803,00.html !


----------
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.jccc.net/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=bahai-st
news://list.jccc.net/bahai-st http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
(public) http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (public)


----------
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.jccc.net/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=bahai-st
news://list.jccc.net/bahai-st
http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist (public)
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (public)

Reply via email to