No, I mean 'properly' published in a book, visible to the bahai community if nothing else,as opposed to unpublished conference presentations, photocopied notes mailed all over the world or internet musings and such like. That is precisely why I quoted the word 'official' to avoid your very inference.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Susan Maneck Sent: Wednesday, 6 August 2003 12:55 a.m. To: Baha'i Studies Subject: Re: Anything new on the House and women question? If you can get a hold of JA and PJ Khan's > Advancement of Women: A Baha'i Perspective, pp.122-134 is the longest > "official" discussion yet published. Dear Steve, I don't think we should regard something written by an individual member of the House has 'official.' When he writes a book of this sort his opinion is no different than anyone elses. ---------- You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.jccc.net/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=bahai-st news://list.jccc.net/bahai-st http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist (public) http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (public)
