Given what Susan was told and Mark's reasoning, I hope the House might at some point consider changing its decision about building the Remey design, but if not, I guess future generations will have to live with it, as strange as this seems.


Susan Maneck wrote:
[Marleen] Has the House actually confirmed that the Remey design will be built?  
Given that the Master and Guardian approved Remey and his design before 
he broke the covenant, it would seem that the House would have grounds 
to alter the decision. 
  

That is what I was told when I was on pilgrimage. 
Mark A. Foster wrote:
Also, the Guardian's endorsement of the Temple design was a policy decision, not a textual interpretation. A number of the policies in effect during the ministry of the Guardian have been changed by the House of Justice.
  

----------
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.jccc.net/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=bahai-st
news://list.jccc.net/bahai-st
http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist (public)
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (public)

Reply via email to