|
Given what Susan was told and Mark's reasoning, I hope the House might
at some point consider changing its decision about building the Remey
design, but if not, I guess future generations will have to live with
it, as strange as this seems. Susan Maneck wrote: [Marleen] Has the House actually confirmed that the Remey design will be built? Given that the Master and Guardian approved Remey and his design before he broke the covenant, it would seem that the House would have grounds to alter the decision. That is what I was told when I was on pilgrimage.Mark A. Foster wrote: Also, the Guardian's endorsement of the Temple design was a policy decision, not a textual interpretation. A number of the policies in effect during the ministry of the Guardian have been changed by the House of Justice. ---------- |
- Temple Designs by Mason Remey Max Jasper
- Re: Temple Designs by Mason Remey M Chase
- Re: Temple Designs by Mason Remey David Friedman
- Re: Temple Designs by Mason Remey Susan Maneck
- Re: Temple Designs by Mason Remey Mark A. Foster
- RE: Temple Designs by Mason Remey M Chase
- RE: Temple Designs by Mason Remey Max Jasper
- Re: Temple Designs by Mason Remey Richard H. Gravelly
- Re: Temple Designs by Mason Remey Susan Maneck
- Re: Temple Designs by Mason Remey Brent Poirier
- Re: Temple Designs by Mason Remey David Friedman
- Re: Temple Designs by Mason Remey Brent Poirier
- Re: Temple Designs by Mason Remey Brent Poirier
- RE: Temple Designs by Mason Remey Vaughn Sheline
