Hi, I was discussing this with Gliff on IM.
I dont get this at all. You are saying, had the Pulsar not been there, you would have bought a Caliber but not the CBZ? or Fiero? Or ZMA? What is *so* wrong with these bikes that you are actually willing to downgrade your segment itself in terms of power, handling, fun? Am really curious to know that. Call me brand un-loving if you want, but if the F2 was not there, I would not have taken the Victor! I'd have chosen the Pul or if I could stretch the budget, the CBZ. How could you even consider a Cailber when you wanted something 150+ cc? we are talking entirely different segments. Yours and Gliff's mail makes it sound like non BAL bikes are untouchables. Of course, if you really feel so, it's your feeling and you have a right to it. :) On 7/23/07, james. r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Gliff hi, > > Well said. Me too would've got a Caliber or something like that. Not > CBZ/Fiero. It was the same replica made me to go for 150. It was this > group > which made me to upgrade to 180. It made me feel happy every time I > see/ride > it. Its a great feeling..... > > -- Kailas Shastry. -- !! -- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
