On 7/24/07, james. r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For u Bajaj will never make good bike. For me Bajaj is the only company to > give VFM bike......Its my personal feeling similar to urs & I can't give u > any proof for it. I'm not employed in BAL but still I like that company > thats it....I've never seen it also. > You don't have to say it explicitly. Its very clear from the following comment of yours. On 7/23/07, james. r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well said. Me too would've got a Caliber or something like that. Not > CBZ/Fiero. It was the same replica made me to go for 150. It was this group > which made me to upgrade to 180. It made me feel happy every time I see/ride > it. Its a great feeling.....
> Just b'coz of this argument myself & Gliff r not going to sell of our "not > good bike" Pulsars & buy a Fiero since ur records says it to be the > "fastest, least maintained, Most mileage returning bike". > Ahem, when did I say that Fiero is the "fastest", "least maintained", "most mileage returning bike"? Please don't shoot in air. When did I say Pulsar is not a good bike, in this thread only, if I remember correctly I have said Pulsar and Splendor are two of worlds best bike and Fiero is a flop. > Lets discuss something which will be useful for this list & close this > thread here. > Read the first off topic post on this thread. It was all about the news article stating Bajaj is planing to buy Ducati and the reasons for the same. Who jumped tracks and started discussing what TVS lacked and what not? Nav
