Hey Pratap, Bulls / ZMA's seem just right. Bulls will call for attention more often.
If you're thinking about the cast iron engines, its a good choice provided your long rides would mostly show your needle hovering around 80kmph. Periodic bursts above that are fine, but even just cruising at above 100kmph for some time might end up the engine in a soup even though the feel is that it was going quite aaram se. (referring to the cast iron engined 350cc I had a bad time with) Been there felt that. Could be it was falt with just the bike I'm riding. On the other hand, you can push a Karizma as much as you like without worrying much as long as you ensure oil changes every 1500 kms. You may get more speed on a ZMA without worrying, but the feel good factor while cruising between 60-80kmph lies just with the Bull. In addition to that, I'd ratev the stability of the bull way higher than a ZMA anyday. Thats with reference to Fast straights on windy days, as well as the fast jumps from those high but smooth speed breakers. While Karizmas could wobble just a bit there, Bulls fly past straight as an arrow. You'll love Karizma's slick gearbox compared to that of the Bull If you get the chance to ride, ride both and then decide. All the best for your choice. Regards, Eric --- In [email protected], "prathap" <prath...@...> wrote: > > Kapil: Thanks for your view - Looks like ZMA to me. > > Deepak: I dont even remember about my Vstrom tank! Anyway, I m riding a > bicycle now, so any tank will seem large. > > > --- In [email protected], Deepak <deepakvdongre@> wrote: > > Hence I would say it would be better off getting a ZMA... > > eitherways you dont have much to choose from :P > > > > Regards, > > > > Deepak > > > > >
