True. I think ZMA will come last in fun factor department. Its so bland that you can sleep riding it, i have :)
However, if your commute if on cracked/bumpy roads or after long office/college hours or if you plan to go long distances you will thank yourself for choosing a ZMA. It takes you to your destination fresh. I have ridden Pulsar 150 for over 57000 kms and P220 for ~3000 kms and ZMA for ~15000kms, though bajaj has put better shocks in 220 when compared to the Pulsar 150UG, it is still no match for the ZMA. Where are u based? if in mumbai/navi mumbai, meet up. you can test both 220 and ZMA @ my place and decide :) regards, Kapil On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Arpan Divanjee <[email protected]>wrote: > If you want a bike which is quick, inexpensive to maintain, and has > the best level of features then its the 220. > ZMA was launched in 2003 as far as i rem. not one upgrade/change( lets > keep the R out ;) ) > I have ridden a classic 350, ZMA and 220 extensively. If i was given a > chance to go back and change my decision to buy a 220, i would still > buy a 220.it has something which ZMA doesn't have - fun factor. > Yes the vibes are higher but are you looking at doing 18 hr riding > days on a daily basis that it makes a diff :) > Bye > Arpan > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
