Hi,

I've done 14+ hrs almost 700k days many times over,

no soreness.

which is not at all saying that I don't want a ZMA :)

the recntest bike I helped decide on was a ZMA - for the customizability
more than anything else

rest mostly +1 with you.

earlier this year did a lot of dirt tracks and offroading. QrS did not
complain :) 21K now

if there is a deal breaker on the 220 for me its the RVMs ...

ciao
gr

@Arpan: Maybe technically 220's shocks are better, i dont know. I am talking
>
> Anyways, going over muddy or offroads, i felt ZMA is more maneuverable.
> maybe its just me.
> One more thing that i would like to highlight is that the 220 has been a
> reliable machine so far (23K kms old) and has not had any relaibility
> issues, contrary to what i have heard over net.
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to