Cuman meneruskan saja, kalau sudah ada yang posting duluan, ya abaikan saja. Ni hasil diskusi blogger sama Menkominfo.
http://www.detikinet.com/index.php/detik.read/tahun/2008/bulan/04/tgl/08 /time/092059/idnews/919934/idkanal/398 -imsuryawan- http://imsuryawan.net <http://imsuryawan.net/> ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of siapa_heru Sent: Tuesday, 8 April 2008 12:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [baliblogger] Re: Cyber law worries bloggers tentang UU ITE, kalo ada yang keberatan ntar kalo udah masuk lembaran negara silahkan judicial review. heru http://kataheru.com <http://kataheru.com> --- In [email protected] <mailto:baliblogger%40yahoogroups.com> , antonemus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > semeton belogger yth, > > meneruskan saja berita di bawah ini. begitulah memang. UU ITE, pemblokiran > YouTube, dst. Kata Win, ini tanda2 zaman kegelapan di Indonesia. Waspadalah, > waspadalah! *kayak Bung api. hihihi* > > -- > > Cyber law worries bloggers > > Tifa Asrianti , The Jakarta Post , Jakarta | Mon, 04/07/2008 11:16 AM > | Headlines > > In a meeting organized by the British Council on Friday, bloggers expressed > concerns the new law on electronic information and transaction could make > them susceptible to charges of defamation. > > Blogger Enda Nasution said bloggers were being more careful now as the law > opened up possibilities of prosecution for providing "sensitive" content > about public figures and certain issues on their sites. > > "Bloggers can get in trouble by just linking to a website containing > defamation. In an indirect way, the law bans freedom of expression," Enda > said. > > After two years of deliberation, the House of Representatives passed the > Electronic Information and Transaction Law last month, which prohibits > citizens from distributing slander in any electronic format. Perpetrators > can get a maximum of six years in prison or a fine of Rp 1 billion > (US$107,526). > > The law also prohibits any kind of pornography, gambling, blackmail, lies, > threats and racist comments. > > Another blogger, Wicaksono, said the blogosphere could not be separated from > opinions. Therefore, there would always be people who liked or disliked the > content and the government should not levy criminal charges against people > based on subjective judgments. > > "In developed countries, the government lets the communities make > regulations to organize themselves. Besides, in other countries, libel is no > longer a criminal matter but a civil matter," Wicaksono said. > > He said it was bloggers themselves who should make a regulation on > expression. > > Blogger Raditya Dika said he recently deleted two posts after friends warned > him about the defamation articles in the cyber law. One of the posts he took > off was a parody of a local election containing deformed photos of the > running candidates. > > "Even if no cyber law existed, bloggers should always be careful what they > say in their blogs because it may offend other people's feelings," he said. > > Asmara Letizia said that no law was supposed to regulate how people > expressed opinions. > > "So far, I haven't deleted anything I have posted in my blogs. I believe we > have to be responsible and consistent on what we have said. We can still > protest other people as long as we can do it in an unoffending way," she > said. > > "I think the government should pay more attention to copyright issues > because there are cases in which people take blog content from blogs but do > not attribute the authors." > > - > anton | http://rumahtulisan.com <http://rumahtulisan.com> >
