I suddenly realized that I'd sent this directly to Paul, rather than to the list (reply syndrome).

Ian

Paul Vernon Lydiate wrote:
Hi All,

  
While it is true that the code generates a tree-
like table of who did what, it is incredibly dry.
    

But still better than nothing...
I agree. Any increase in the amount of information characters have would be helpful.
  
I would love to see someone take on providing a fair but witty
    
interpretation
  
of the report.  So I'll ask again, as I'm certain I have before, if there
    
is
  
anyone with time to take a machine generated report of who did what
and translate it into a more readable format?
    

I'd be happy to contribute to this by providing a section or three but, as I
said in the previous mail, compiling the whole each month is pretty
daunting...
I'd also be willing to contribute to this. I've written for Quincy in ToH and also for Max in London EG, and wouldn't mind doing a some more. As with those games, I'd suggest that we try to get a group of people, each with assigned areas (campaign, love, duels, court, whatever).

Ian/JdB




Reply via email to