On 7/24/08, Anand Chitipothu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > However the status of Infogami and Webpy seem to be a bit dissapointing > in > > the sense that the most prolific and original developer is no longer > > maintaining either of those. It's a shame... looked like something that > has > > lot of promise. > > Did you say web.py is not under active development?
Yup. I generally trust Ohloh's analysis -- while it may not be perfect, it is comprehensive in the parameters it considers for it's ratings. As per Ohloh, this is "web.py"'s profile -- http://www.ohloh.net/projects/5941 & this is Django's -- (ps> I still have no special love for Django) http://www.ohloh.net/projects/django > There are very exciting changes in queue for the upcoming 0.3 release. Good to hear that. I guess with more check-ins happening, even the indicative Ohloh figures would go up. Not that the web.py enthusiasts should necessarily care about, however, a better image, some evangelism wouldn't hurt. cheers, Banibrata
_______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
