On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:35 AM, Banibrata Dutta wrote:
Yup. I generally trust Ohloh's analysis -- while it may not be perfect, it is comprehensive in the parameters it considers for it's ratings. As per Ohloh, this is "web.py"'s profile --
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/5941
& this is Django's --  (ps> I still have no special love for Django)
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/django


There are very exciting changes in queue for the upcoming 0.3 release.

Good to hear that. I guess with more check-ins happening, even the indicative Ohloh figures would go up. Not that the web.py enthusiasts should necessarily care about, however, a better image, some evangelism wouldn't hurt.

Yup. I generally trust Ohloh's analysis -- while it may not be perfect, it is comprehensive in the parameters it considers for it's ratings. As per Ohloh, this is "django"'s profile --
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/django
& this is PHP's --  (ps> I still have no special love for PHP)
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/php

Good to hear that. I guess with more check-ins happening, even the indicative Ohloh figures would go up. Not that the django enthusiasts should necessarily care about, however, a better image, some evangelism wouldn't hurt.


_______________________________________________
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers

Reply via email to