For a moment you had me guessing & blinking as to what the response was all about :-) !!
On 7/25/08, Pradeep Gowda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:35 AM, Banibrata Dutta wrote: > >> Yup. I generally trust Ohloh's analysis -- while it may not be perfect, it >> is comprehensive in the parameters it considers for it's ratings. As per >> Ohloh, this is "web.py"'s profile -- >> http://www.ohloh.net/projects/5941 >> & this is Django's -- (ps> I still have no special love for Django) >> http://www.ohloh.net/projects/django >> >> >> There are very exciting changes in queue for the upcoming 0.3 release. >> >> Good to hear that. I guess with more check-ins happening, even the >> indicative Ohloh figures would go up. Not that the web.py enthusiasts should >> necessarily care about, however, a better image, some evangelism wouldn't >> hurt. >> > > Yup. I generally trust Ohloh's analysis -- while it may not be perfect, it > is comprehensive in the parameters it considers for it's ratings. As per > Ohloh, this is "django"'s profile -- > http://www.ohloh.net/projects/django > & this is PHP's -- (ps> I still have no special love for PHP) > http://www.ohloh.net/projects/php > > Good to hear that. I guess with more check-ins happening, even the > indicative Ohloh figures would go up. Not that the django enthusiasts should > necessarily care about, however, a better image, some evangelism wouldn't > hurt. > > > _______________________________________________ > BangPypers mailing list > BangPypers@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers > -- regards, Banibrata http://www.linkedin.com/in/bdutta http://octapod.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
